Too much time has passed for this injustice. I'm sorry for it.
After analyzing all Godmaker’s replay I’ve come to the conclusion that he got his nickname spoofed.
Im not going to argument that it couldn’t be him because he is in Dubai and the host is from Jordan and the result will be a so laggy game that he couldn’t even move properly as to hook with the accuracy we can observe in the replay in question ( http://replay.garena.com/view.php?id=4cb7c54b5ec13 ).
Although we cant known were actually the host was from I have no reason to doubt that is from no other place than JO and It’s known to me that Godmaker is in Dubai so this frail evidence but interesting detail is to be considered because it’s very important to determine whether it’s really him or not.
Let’s go to the core of my argumentation:
After analyzing all Godmaker’s replay at my disposition (http://replay.garena.com/userlist.php?p=GodMaker) I’ve come to the conclusion that he got his nickname spoofed.
I ground my reasoning on some simple but really clear and logic facts which are:
1) Only in one replay we can observe “he” had maphack.This fact speaks by its own and it tells a lot of to me, because it’s the common way when incriminating innocent people, only one and so clear replay to prove someone to be a maphacker. It’s all about patterns because the person who played that pudge couldn’t make more obvious that he was using maphack in order to make himself certain that everyone will notice it.
As a result we have : only one replay with maphack + too obvious = really really really dubious.
2) English outputThis is another aspect that led me to question the possibility of namespoof, let’s compare those games which were saved froma player in the opposite team of Godmaker ( for sentinel-scourge chat reasons ) to grasp it clearly :
First chat – Namespoofer ; Second chat - Godmaker
10:30 [All] GodMaker: ?
10:40 [All] GodMaker: play
10:40 [All] GodMaker: me no mh
20:12 [All] GodMaker: JAJAJAJA
20:13 [All] GodMaker: HAAHHAAH
27:11 [All] GodMaker: thx
34:16 [All] GodMaker: lol
34:17 [All] GodMaker: Ezalor
34:50 [All] GodMaker: COMING FOR HELP
36:07 [All] GodMaker: HAHAHAH
36:29 [All] GodMaker: GG nabs
_________________________________
04:15 [All] GodMaker: well i stoped attacking..
04:19 [All] GodMaker: but my lvl 1 killed him
05:07 [All] GodMaker: who is afk
10:36 [All] GodMaker: i think yeah
10:41 [All] GodMaker: we are owning so easy
10:56 [All] GodMaker: go to them
11:09 [All] GodMaker: pugna not u
11:11 [All] GodMaker: let sweet slut go
11:25 [All] GodMaker: sweet slut will go to them
11:41 [All] GodMaker: destroyer refused
14:32 [All] GodMaker: u'll be reported
14:44 [All] GodMaker: same baby
15:04 [All] GodMaker: lol same also if afk there is relpy can be posted
15:16 [All] GodMaker: play dude its just a game
57:39 [All] GodMaker: gg
57:41 [All] GodMaker: noobs
Ignore the number of lines or words that in each case are typed because that’s basically determined by the nature of each game but pay a close attention to the structure of them , in the first chatlog we practically don’t see any structure, it’s just some messages formed by a word or two put them together whereas in the second one you can percieve a syntax, clauses with a normal and coherent structure. This is one of the clearest pieces of evidence.
3) Broken recurrent patterns.I had the immense luck to be able to compare the pudge played in the replay with maphack with another two pudges played by the real Godmaker or at least by a different player.
Pudge0 (with mh) : http://replay.garena.com/view.php?id=4cb7c54b5ec13
Pudge1 (no mh) : http://replay.garena.com/view.php?id=4ca310f8340da
Pudge2 (no mh) : http://replay.garena.com/view.php?id=4cc422441a5c1
The distrubution of skill points in dota or commonly called “skilling”, “skillset” , “skillbuild” are one of the most stable things in experienced players because once they have played a considerable amount of games the skill point distribution becomes solid and hardly up to be changed.
Let’s compare our three pudges :
The pudge with maphack skilled the three first point as follows : 1) rot 2) hook 3) hook
whereas the other two pudges (pudge1 and pudge2) skilled them like this : 1) rot 2) hook 3) rot
There’s also another pattern which was broken by the person who pretended to incriminate Godmaker of maphack. This one is about items.
The three pudges made these items : arcane boots , vanguard and hood of defiance , but one of these pudges get them in a different order –guess who- . They all made arcane boots as the first item, nonetheless pudge1 and pudge2 started to build hood of defiance since the earliest stages of the game and made vanguard in the last instance whereas pudge0 (with maphack) made it in the second place leaving hood of defiance to the last.
(Although interesting, this evidence is weaker than the skillset one because a player might judge what item has to be done depending always on the circumstances of the game, but that’s regarding to pro skilled players and noone of the different users we are dealing with here are of such level of skill so it’s of quite relevance)
There is also a huge difference in the gamestyle, someone may say it’s due to maphack, but just watch those three replays and you will see how one pudge’s game performance is so different from the other two.
I strongly believe Godmaker got his nickname spoofed and hereby I’m to unban him (when servers are fine again of course ^_^)